新闻动态
NEWS
发布日期:2026-02-12
Analyzing player positions
The user is asking about comparing Philipp Lahm's playing positions with Joshua Kimmich's versatility. They seem to want an analysis of which position might be better for Lahm while referencing Kimmich. This isn’t focused on code, just sports discussion. I should highlight pros and cons, mention tactical fit, and consider the needs of different teams, including examples from Guardiola's time. Lahm was a world-class right-back but also excelled in midfield, while Kimmich has shown similar versatility.Summarizing positional analysis
I’m outlining the differences between Lahm and Kimmich's playing styles while keeping it concise. Here’s a quick breakdown:
- Conclusion: Lahm is a historically great right-back; top-tier in midfield but not quite legendary. For maximizing team benefit, right-back is best, especially for balance.
- Tactical points for Lahm as a right-back: positioning, marking, clean distribution, and crossing opportunities. He solidifies defense.
- As a midfielder, Lahm excels under pressure and in tight spaces but struggles with aerial duels and coverage radius.
- Kimmich shares similarities with Lahm but has unique strengths like longer passing and set-piece ability; defense requires a more athletic partner.
- Recommendations depend on team weaknesses: if lacking a sweeping midfielder, don't use Lahm as a solo 6.
- Summary: Lahm is a first-choice right-back; Kimmich is best as a midfielder, but both can adapt based on opponents.
我的看法:拉姆历史级右后卫;中场也很强但上限略低于他在边卫的位置。基米希相反,更像是首选中场,但根据阵容也能回到右后卫打出高水平。
一句话:拉姆首选右后卫、基米希首选中场,但两人真正的价值在于可随对手与阵容即时切换位置,给教练更高的战术弹性。